Commuitarian vs individualistic

Meekins Copyright The Coming of The Killer Beavers A Lanham, Maryland man found his property endangered by a duo of busy beavers the literal bucktoothed dam-building kind. Concerned over the fate of his property, he called various agencies for help.

Commuitarian vs individualistic

United States The intent of this paper is to examine individualistic and communitarian cultural ideologies within two distinctly different political environments. The first challenge in comparing two nations is deciding which approach is most appropriate.

There are several approaches in political science that have proven most beneficial when making comparisons. This study will use a comparative government approach to examine the political institutions, processes, constitutions, and functions of government within each of the two countries selected.

The countries that have been chosen for this study are United States and Norway, respectively. Gregory Scott believes that the fundamental aspects of human interaction in society are the need for community unity and the need for individuality.

The argument is that the entire history of politics is largely the story of how communities and nations resolved the inherent conflict between the universal needs for community and individuality. With that, the topic that this paper tends to address has emerged, within the study of politics in this class and others, as the single most dynamic in scope and in implication.

Freedom, equality, and justice combine to build a substantial argument for the individualistic ideology.

Politics Essays and Research Papers | khmnet

Authority, order, and democracy are all building blocks for the argument of the communitarian. Scott notes that much of what motivates individualist is a strong desire for freedom.

This author also argues that we are all interdependent and authority is justified by the need to bring order to societies competing values and thoughts.

In studying the history of humanity, the battleground that has been formed between the need for individuality and unity is undeniable. If people are seen as dangerous, then a government to protect people from that danger is most appropriate.

If people are viewed as capable of fulfilling their own creative potential, you may want a government that protects individual liberties Scott, These are all examples of core values for the entire foundation of government and of politics. This argument, for the use and scope of government, is divided into many different arguments that address basic issues of political science.

Political scientists believe that individuals and their actions are what lead to collective problems. The problem is that our individual actions, each perfectly consistent with our individual preferences, can and often do combine to produce collective outcomes that none of us would have chosen Bickers, And thus lead to the need for protection against those outcomes, administered through a democratic government.

There are several authors that are noted for their dynamic research on the communitarian movement. The spokesperson for the contemporary communitarian movement is Amitai Etzioni. He explains that communitarians believe that the fundamental and central political problem is finding the right amount of togetherness and common concern.

If people are too unified, they become authoritarian and attempt to use the state to impose a common set of beliefs and practices. Like ancient philosophers, communitarians find the lack of unified purpose and direction in society to be a crucial problem.

Hofstede's Value Dimensions Essays

Those who speak of the joys of not associating with others, but of being left alone by them, are most closely associated with individualism. And their noteworthy spokesperson is author and abolitionist Henry David Thoreau.

The communitarian movement seeks to shore up the moral, social, and political foundations of society. It builds on the elementary social science observation that people are born without any moral or social values. If they are to become civil they most acquire values.An individualistic society depends upon the values of freedom and independence, while a collectivistic society depends on group harmony and consensus.

The values in each society play an intricate. Collectivism in which some cultures are more individualistic, they like privacy, value independence and individual initiative.

Commuitarian vs individualistic

Whereas in the collective culture family and good friends are favored and interdependence, (where individuals are dependent upon one another) are more valued. Communitarianism is the 'balancing of the individual's rights against those of the community.' In the US Constitution we are guaranteed rights that we were born with: life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

Communitarian Vs. Individualistic Ideologies A Comparative Analysis: Norway Vs. United States The intent of this paper is to examine individualistic and communitarian cultural ideologies within two distinctly different political environments. Communitarianism is a philosophy that emphasizes the connection between the individual and the overriding philosophy is based upon the belief that a person's social identity and personality are largely molded by community relationships, with a smaller degree of development being placed on individualism.

However, to say that communitarian theory of civil association are incorrect because of this one thread in the tapestry of the tradition is an oversimplification of communitarianism.

Communitarian and individualism are different metaphysical positions on what make up society that have emerged from the history of political philosophy.

Communitarianism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)