Thus, "eu-Thanatos" meaning easy or good death. Euthanasia is a better choice for terminal patients than suicide. But euthanasia is usually gentle and quiet.
The topic had to be about censorship or banning, so being the unique person I am, I decided to do the prohibition of drugs!
Prohibition of alcohol was even attempted in the early s before the idea of regulating personal choices was found to be unwarranted and expensive. The War on Drugs is racist. How are minorities expected to prosper in America if fathers are being taken away to prison for nonviolent crimes, leaving children helpless for money in the inner cities?
In the s prohibition of alcohol did nothing more than create a black market which allowed organized crime to flourish and violence to rise. The prohibition of drugs has reacted no differently and anyone who has watched the news can see the effects of it.
Fatherless children take to the streets joining gangs and selling drugs so they can have enough money to eat and live, though often ending up murdered or imprisoned. Where is the morality in creating such a vicious cycle?
Who has given the government the right to stir up such violence and disparity by creating these black markets in the name of protecting the citizens from unhealthy choices?
The end does not justify the means. Though advocates for the War on Drugs believe that the actions that have been taken are quite moral. Who gave the government the right to start this prohibition of drugs? The people did, through democratically elected officials.
As a society it has been decided that the use of drugs that have no medical purpose is immoral and those who use them are criminals. How could citizens have a functioning community if cocaine and methamphetamines were to be legal? Millions upon millions of people will start to lead criminal lives to feed their addictions, education will start to plummet because children have easy access to mind-altering narcotics and families will be torn apart because love of drugs will overpower love of family.
Where is the morality in creating such a world? In order to have a strong country, we must have strong morals. Strong countries always need a strong economy, however, and the War on Drugs has revealed to be very costly.
When prison systems have been overcrowded for decades is it really wise to put marijuana users in prison at the expensive of the taxpayer?
Have police resources not been thinned enough? Furthermore, when has it been the policy for governments to forbid farmers to grow cash crops? Hemp can produce cheaper and superior ethanol than corn can, premium clothes, rope and paper, and yet farmers are prohibited to grow it.
So not only does prohibition cost physically but through potential business profits as well. When drug cartels in South America and the Middle East grow and sell illegal substances to American citizens it should be viewed as an attack on this nation.
An Associated Press recently reported that Mexican nationals have been growing marijuana in American national forests and parks.
If the government spends money on anything it should be on the defense for the people and, advocates believe, the War on Drugs is a defensive war. Yet those same advocates will have a tough time explaining how people will need to be defended from sick and dying patients. The Drug Enforcement Agency has continued to raid medical marijuana users and dispensaries throughout California while throwing dying people in jail for simply using a medicine that worked for them.
In the early s when the government wanted to prohibit the use of alcohol they did so through a constitutional amendment. There seems to be no justification for banning the use of marijuana and, in a true free society, any other drug for that matter. Will the people from freest country in the world demand the end of prohibition, or will they continue the immoral, costly and unjustified War on Drugs?
How many more inner city families need to be split up for this to end? If the past is any indication, the future will only tread closer to serfdom rather than sprint back to freedom. Americans will profess their love of free speech and thoughts, but the taboo of drugs has prevented most of them to expand that love towards free actions for their own bodies.
Man cannot remain free if an outside force can regulate their personal actions, for that is nothing less than slavery.The first goal of the war on drug policies is to ensure a drug-free environment. The United States government formed these policies about forty years ago with an intention to eradicate the use of drugs in the society absolutely.
Oct 23, · Essay on War on Drugs I wrote an argumentative essay for my English class on the War on Drugs. The topic had to be about censorship or banning, so being the unique person I am, I decided to do the prohibition of drugs! The War on Drugs. There have been times in history when leaders would not have questioned their subjects’ rights to consume anything.
It was understood that one should care for one’s own health as best as possible and damaging things went against that but it was up to the individual. Drug Abuse (Argumentative Essay Sample) June 2, by admin Argumentative Essay, Essay Samples, Free Essay Samples.
As a result of this argument, some people are advocating for the legalization of particular drugs such as weed claiming that such drugs will result to a reduction in the levels of criminal activities. Most people go .
Essay The War On Drugs And Drug Abuse “The most important problem in America is drug abuse.”- Richard Nixon The House I Live In is an eye-opening documentary that informs people of what the war on drugs truly is. The black community has been the initial target of . Some of the drugs essay topics that students may choose to write on drugs are: argumentative essay on legalizing drugs, illegal drugs essay, addiction to drugs essay, essay about drug effects, and drugs introduction essay.