Concordat on Openness on Animal Research Cosmetic testing Testing cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals was banned in the UK in and across the EU in The ban was created because non-animal methods were developed to test the safety of the cosmetics.
Regardless of the turnaround time or field of study, you can be sure we have qualified personnel to handle the assignment for you. Our writers are knowledgeable in virtually all subject areas and will process your assignment as fast as possible to beat the deadlines.
Quality Guarantee We have an exceptional team of proficient writers with a vast experience in writing quality academic essays. Therefore, we will deliver academic essays of amazing quality not available anywhere else. You can bet on that!
Best essay writers You will not find competent and certified essay writers like the ones on our spectacular team. We are your best bet for having a professionally written essay that will get you the best grades in no time. Let us process your essay and you will see only amazing results with us.
Plagiarism free With us, originality and uniqueness are paramount factors to success. We can Animal testing cosmetics testing compromise on that.
You can bet that we double check our essays so you know you will receive original work every time. Online chat with writers We have many competent and certified writers available to process your essay and you can chat with them online to find the best one to work with.
Fast delivery of essay We have many certified writers who are ready to happily process your essay even with a 4-hour deadline. Our team of writing experts is available on call and can churn out an outstanding essay for you on short notice without compromising on quality.
Affordable prices Our essay writing service is tailored to fit your budget. We have only affordable prices for you, and we offer a quality service. Given that an animal is a sentient being, can we really rationalise that its death is good to us and benefits society?
Utilitarianism argues that we should do the most good that we can do, or if that something is right, it should benefit the majority.
If we discriminate on grounds of species, we are essentially saying that one species is better than another and that it deserves less consideration than another, but can this really be justified? Is a human being more important than an animal just because it is of a different species. Is it necessary to carry out animal testing to the great degree that our society does in this day and age?
You may find it harrowing that an overwhelmingly large proportion of animal testing is actually done by the cosmetic or pharmaceutical industry.
Is there any reason that we need to develop a new shade of lipstick if we already have enough shades available?
Blatant consumerism is fueling animal testing, but should the market respond? Many people would argue that the amount of animal testing we do is unjustified, because most of it is in fact not for gain to society. Not only this but there are also cases of the US military using monkeys and teaching them to try and fly planes so that they can then test the effects of different poisonous substances on flight ability.
Does this not seem like a futile and pointlessly cruel act? A lot of medical experts would argue that animal testing is justifiable in order to save the lives of many people longer down the line through the development of medicines and lifesaving drugs.
Even reputable ethics professors such as Peter Singer have been seen to defend some claims that animal experimentation can in fact make human lives better in an argumentative essay on animal testing. Tipu Aziz, a famous neurosurgeon, explains that over 40, people have been made better as a result of a treatment that had been developed as a result of experimentation on monkeys, leading to the lives of over monkeys severely compromised.
Is this a justifiable cost?Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.
Consumers and manufacturers sometimes ask about the use of animals for testing cosmetics. The following information addresses the legal requirement for .
Dangerous animal testing Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around , heart attacks and strokes and , deaths worldwide.
Cosmetics testing on animals continues in the U.S and around the world, despite public support for cruelty-free products. Cosmetic testing on animals is a type of animal testing used to test the safety and hypoallergenic properties of products for use by humans.
Due to the harm done to the animal subjects, this testing is opposed by animal rights activists and others. Cosmetic animal testing is banned in the European Union, India, Israel, and Norway.
Methods of testing cosmetics on animals include many different tests that are categorized differently based on which areas the cosmetics will be used for. Norway banned cosmetics animal testing the same time as the EU.